

Missed calls leave no record in your POS or platform data. They simply appear as customers who ordered somewhere else — or never ordered at all.
Most venues have no way to measure what they're losing. That's the real problem.
Industry average across
Australian restaurants
Of missed calls are orders, bookings,
or catering requests
From missing just
5 revenue calls per day
This report analyses ordering behaviour across 1,067 Australian restaurants and cafés — combining public data signals, website analysis, review insights, and aggregated platform order data. Most operators never see this loss. Missed calls leave no record.
Average order value
Volume of phone orders at venue
Phone orders are typically family meals, group takeaways, catering requests, and complex orders customers prefer to talk through. That drives a higher basket size on every single call.
At 70+ orders per week, that $5 difference compounds to over $19,000 in additional annual revenue — from the same number of customers.
of venues peak on Friday
of venues peak on Saturday
of high-phone venue orders arrive Friday–Sunday
These are also the moments when staff are busiest. When phones ring during peak service, calls go to voicemail and customers simply call another restaurant. The venues solving this treat the phone channel as infrastructure, not a staffing problem.
If a restaurant misses just five revenue-related calls per day, the maths adds up quickly:
One venue in our study receives roughly:
Total orders per week across all channels
Of those orders come via phone
Of their total out of venue order volume via phone
Now consider what happens if those calls aren't answered. Industry data suggests restaurants miss around one in three calls…
If this venue missed just one third of their phone calls:
And that's from a single venue.
Most operators never see this loss — because missed calls leave no record.
Across the 1,067 venues analysed their phone orders were:
In other words:
Nearly one in three restaurants depends
heavily on the phone to capture orders.
Source: HungryHungry internal dataset combining Google Business Profile signals, website analysis and review keyword analysis across 1,067 venues
The cuisines most reliant on phone ordering:
These cuisines commonly serve group meals, where customers prefer to talk through their order rather than click through an app. For these venues, the phone isn't optional. It's a core ordering channel.
Do you hear the phone ring during service?
Does it ever go unanswered?
Do staff sometimes say "we'll call them back?"
Phone ordering isn't going away. Customers still call restaurants to:
The challenge isn't demand. The challenge is capturing those calls when your team is busiest.
Industry data suggests restaurants miss around one in three calls, and most of those calls relate directly to revenue. When phones ring during peak service, even great teams simply can't answer every call.
The venues performing best in this report recognise this reality. They treat the phone channel the same way they treat online ordering — as infrastructure.
In other words: They capture every order, regardless of how the customer chooses to place it.
To address the missed-call problem, many restaurants are beginning to adopt AI phone agents designed specifically for hospitality.
One example is Otto, a voice AI system built for restaurants and takeaway venues.
Otto answers incoming calls instantly, takes full orders, handles bookings and enquiries, and sends everything directly to the kitchen — even during peak service.
Most importantly, the phone channel becomes something restaurants can measure, manage, and grow, rather than something that gets overwhelmed during busy periods.

This report analyses ordering behaviour across more than 1,000 Australian restaurants and cafés, combining public data signals, website analysis, review insights, and aggregated platform order data.
The aim of the report is to better understand how restaurants capture phone orders — and where revenue is being missed.
The Restaurant Phone Report 2026